I think it is time for a new kind of apologetics.
Christian apologetics is popularly defined as the study of the defense of the Christian faith. Generally in this category, you will find arguments for the veracity of Scripture, defenses of Christ's resurrection, and (depending on the brand of Christianity) evidence of a young-earth. Usually apologists have clearly laid out logical forms of argumentation that can clearly delineate the reasonableness of faith and deconstruct the most popular arguments of New Atheism. They rigorously reform themselves to recognize fallacies and spot straw men and red herrings a mile away. This is apologetics of intellect, of the mind.
But I think it is time for a new kind of apologetics. Or maybe, an older sort.
I propose apologetics of the heart.
In 1 Peter, where we find that famous word "apologia", we find it amid words like
suffer,
sanctify, and
good behavior. It clings to the tail-end of Peter's teaching on suffering servants, submissive wives, and compassionate husbands. The epistle calls Christians to
radically good behavior in the face of unjust circumstance and suffering. This radically good behavior infuses the oppressed - specifically servants and wives in this letter - with the power of a special connection to the suffering of Christ Himself. It empowers the downtrodden with purpose in the face of inescapable evil.
The radically good behavior of the oppressed however, is not identical to the good behavior of those in power. Look at Peter's words to husbands, who in that time and place had significant control over wives and servants.
In the same way ,
live with your wives in an understanding way, as with someone weaker, since she is a woman" . Peter does not give husbands, the ones with power, a call to suffering, but a call to
compassion. It is my theory here that "weaker" in this context
refers to the vulnerability of a woman's position -
an emphasis on her lack of control over her own circumstance and the world around her - not on a specific ontological "weakness" that delegates her to an innately inferior status. Peter tells husbands to be understanding in the wielding of their social and physical powers over those who have less.
In this day and age, women have more power than they used to. In many ways, Peter's call to husbands can now apply to me when I deal with those who have been subjected to suffering that I have not. The poor, the socially disadvantaged, the orphan, the elderly, the handicapped, and the abused are only a few examples.
When we use our lives to answer Peter's call to radically good behavior, we engage in apologetics. We become a living witness, a living proof of the work of God in the world around us. We can effectively illustrate the hope within us through our suffering or through our privilege, as long as we answer that call in 1 Peter 2: 9-17 to be a chosen race, a royal priesthood, a holy nation, a people for God's own possession, who honors
all people, loves the brotherhood, and fears God.
I want to emphasize that I do not want, in any way, to glamorize abusive situations. Modern evangelical theology as I have encountered it is either ill-equipped or unable to face issues of abuse. I want to delve directly into issues of abuse, specifically domestic abuse and abuse within the Church and how this "apologetics of the heart" can address these issues. (HINT -
it doesn't include statistics).
Of course the heart and mind do not exclude each other, and we can equally engage both, but it is vital that even our intellectual apologetics are infused with "gentleness and respect" that comes from the heart.
I'd love to hear your thoughts!